body image scale hopwood
For example, hypothesis testing for construct validity is rated as “sufficient” if at least 75% of the results are in accordance with the hypotheses. Validation studies of other PROMs that reported original data on the BIS (as comparison instrument) were also included. 2 When one conceptualizes body image in this comprehensive manner, it is clear that the range of bodily changes cancer patients may undergo prior to, during the process of, or following treatment are encompassed here. J Res Med Sci 16(8):1047–1054, McDermott E, Moloney J, Rafter N, Keegan D, Byrne K, Doherty GA et al (2014) The body image scale: a simple and valid tool for assessing body image dissatisfaction in inflammatory bowel disease. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26632, Fingeret MC, Nipomnick S, Guindani M, Baumann D, Hanasono M, Crosby M (2014) Body image screening for cancer patients undergoing reconstructive surgery. Discrepancies in ratings were discussed until consensus was reached. Instruments originated in Europe and the United States, with the psychometric properties of validity and reliability were found.The Body Image Scale of Hopwood and module QLQ BR 23 of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer were reported in … For information processing SPSS (version 19), with which the bivariate analysis between sociodemographic variables and the results of the scales were performed and discourse analysis of the interview was In the excellent and good quality studies, values ranged between α = 0.86–0.96 [14, 15, 19, 33]. (2017) presented a review of PROMs measuring body image in cancer patients, including the BIS, and concluded that the measurement properties of these PROMs require more thorough investigation [20]. Eur J Cancer 37(2):189–197, 2001) and to analyze its psychometric properties in a sample of women with breast or gynaecological cancer. Two studies had poor quality and therefore indeterminate results because the time interval was considered too long (6 months compared to 2 weeks in the other studies) [33] and because of a small sample size (n = 19) [19], reporting values of ICC = 0.67 and r = 0.89, respectively. Measurement error and responsiveness were rated as indeterminate, and hypothesis testing for construct validity was rated as inconsistent with a low quality of evidence. Also, the findings were inconsistent and in the study of Khang et al. - BCT and mastectomy with breast reconstruction). Interpretation of measurement error is only possible if a SDC score is compared with data on minimal important change (MIC), but this was not reported. 1. Ansiedad Estrés 9(1):59–84, Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality of life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. The gold standard practice is to have the assessment done by two raters independently because raters initially may have different opinions and consensus is needed. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.04.005, Defrank JT, Mehta CC, Stein KD, Baker F (2007) Body image dissatisfaction in cancer survivors. Se evaluaron 6 áreas, que fueron el grado de satisfacción consigo misma y con los demás, vestida y desnuda, la pérdida de su feminidad, los sentimientos sobre su atractivo sexual, la pérdida de su integridad cor- Correspondence to Hopwood et al. Guilford Press, New York, Lehmann V, Hagedoorn M, Tuinman MA (2014) Body image in cancer survivors: a systematic review of case-control studies. Eur J Cancer 36:1938–1943, Fang SY, Shu BC, Chang YJ (2013) The effect of breast reconstruction surgery on body image among women after mastectomy: a meta-analysis. volume 23, pages473–481(2015)Cite this article. Each measurement property in each individual study was rated as “sufficient” (+), “insufficient” (−), or “indeterminate” (?). European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, MacCallum RC, Widman KF, Zhang S, Hong S (1999) Sample size in factor analysis. Of the remaining 47 studies, 37 were excluded after full-text screening and one was excluded during data extraction. Evidence was categorized into sufficient, insufficient, inconsistent, or indeterminate. he field of body image has experienced a phenomenal growth in recent years. Body image is a multi-dimensional construct and comprises cognitive, behavioral, and affective aspects of appearance [1]. Qual Life Res 21:651–657. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdv181, CAS Article This search did not yield any relevant results for the BIS. validated self-report measures of body image and QoL: Body Image Scale (BIS; Hopwood et al., 2001; Moreira, Silva, Marques, & Canavarro, 2010). The 10-item Body Image Scale was developed by Hopwood et al. feeling self-conscious), behavioural (e.g. Therefore, further research is needed to establish these anchor points on changes that are important. PROSPERO:CRD42017057237. Three fair quality studies also reported a one-factor solution [17, 31, 32] and one fair quality study reported a two-factor solution [16] among breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy. and body image components; short completion time; patient involvement during development of the tool. Google Scholar, Fadaei S, Janighorban M, Mehrabi T, Ahmadi SA, Mokaryan F, Gukizade A (2011) Effects of cognitive behavioral counseling on body Image following mastectomy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 14:111–118. Qual Life Res. Accessed 25 Sep 2017, van der Hout A, van Uden-Kraan CF, Witte BI, Coupé VMH, Leemans CR, Cuijpers P, van de Poll-Franse LV, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2017) Efficacy, cost-utility and reach of an eHealth self-management application “Oncokompas” that helps cancer survivors to obtain optimal supportive care: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. If there were inconsistencies between studies, explanations were explored. It should be noted that in some studies, a two-factor solution was also found. Based on these findings, internal consistency of the BIS overall was rated as sufficient (+) and the quality of evidence of internal consistency was graded as moderate because there is moderate evidence for the unidimensionality of the scale. Qual Life Res 24:1629–1633. These results were qualitatively summarized to obtain an overall rating of the measurement property across all included studies: sufficient (+), insufficient (−), “inconsistent” (±) or indeterminate (?). Clin Psychol Rev 8(1):77–100, Beck AT, Steer RA (1993) Beck Depression Inventory manual. 1985 172 … in 2001 to measure affective, behavioral, and cognitive body image symptoms. In addition to recommendations to include other cancer populations than breast cancer patients [20], we also recommend to study construct validity of the BIS taking into account the impact of various cancer treatments on body image. However, correlation with investment in appearance (ASI-R) was low [17, 18]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(00)00353-1, CAS https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1798-2, Dua P, Heiland MF, Kracen AC, Deshields TL (2017) Cancer-related hair loss: a selective review of the alopecia research literature. [33] after surgery with immediate breast reconstruction. © 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. This study was supported by a public grant from “Agencia Lain Entralgo” (Ministry of Health; Madrid, Spain). The COSMIN methodology is based on taxonomy and definitions of measurement properties for PROMs [21] including content validity, structural validity, internal consistency, cross-cultural validity, reliability, measurement error, criterion validity, hypotheses testing for construct validity, and responsiveness. Psychiatry Investig 10:26–33. For instance, altered body appearance after cancer treatment can be accompanied with feelings of shame, negative self-esteem, or social avoidance [2, 3]. This systematic review provides in-depth insight of the current evidence of the BIS as an instrument to measure body image in cancer patients and complements a recent review [20]. Recently, Muzzatti et al. The Body Image Scale (BIS), designed for the assessment of body image in cancer patients to be completed after surgery, 9,18 consists of 10 items scored from 0 (not at all) to 3 (very much), concerning impact of surgery on self-consciousness, physical and sexual attractiveness, femininity, satisfaction with body and scars, body integrity, and avoidance behavior. A limitation of this review is that content validity was not investigated because at the time we conducted our data extraction, no protocol existed to investigate content validity through a systematic review. With respect to convergent validity, correlations with other body image scales were inconsistent. PubMed J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42. PubMed Central https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3063, Howell D, Molloy S, Wilkinson K, Green E, Orchard K, Wang K, Liberty J (2015) Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors. Quality of the evidence was graded as high, moderate, low, or very low. J Clin Nurs 24:1367–1379. J Palliat Med 18:151–156. Eating Disorders: The Journal of Treatment & Prevention, 10, 103-113. PubMed Based on these findings, hypothesis testing for construct validity was rated as inconsistent (±) because although three studies showed sufficient evidence (> 75% of the hypotheses on known-groups and/or convergent validity confirmed) [14, 15, 31], this was contradicted by four studies showing insufficient evidence [16, 17, 19, 33]. Evidence on reliability was sufficient because it met the criterion of 0.70 in three out of four studies (range 0.67–0.92). ¿Se ha sentido avergonzada(o) o cohibida(o) por su aspecto físico? The authors declare no conflict of interest. If no explanations were found, the overall rating would be inconsistent. The current study will add important information to the previous review [20], which is of high importance when considering the use of the BIS in clinical trials and practice as well as for interpretation of BIS outcomes. Psicooncología 5(1):93–102, Cull A, Sprangers M, Bjordal K, Aaronson N (2002) EORTC Quality of Life Study Group translation procedure. Our results show a stable factorial structure between samples with a single-factor solution and good psychometric properties, suggesting that it is a suitable tool for measuring body image concerns among Spanish-speaking cancer patients. Body image assessment in studies comparing mastectomy (MXT) and breast conserving (BC) surgery Authors Patient Time of assessment Body image Psychometric data sample assessment used for body image scale Ashcroft et al. Cancer patients may have to deal for example with scars or amputated body parts following surgery, skin burns due to radiation therapy, or hair loss due to chemotherapy. This systematic review evaluated the measurement properties of the BIS among nine studies identified in a literature search up to July 2017. The aim of this study is to develop a Spanish version of the Body Image Scale (Hopwood et al. The precise filter was a pragmatic choice because a sensitive filter would provide too many hits to feasibly screen since the overall search encompassed 39 PROMs (Prospero ID 42017057237) [22]. Factor analysis resulted in a single-factor solution, both in the total sample and in the two subgroups, accounting for >76 % variance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-009-0851-7, Article There were indications that consciousness of appearance (DAS24) and shame (ESS) are related with body image, with moderate to high correlations [17]. 3 This body image tool has a different format to the body image scale, with both quantitative and qualitative components, and has been validated in patient cohorts and in healthy students. Out of five studies with fair quality [15,16,17, 31, 33], two studies confirmed the hypotheses [15, 16]. Only one study of good methodological quality reported a change in BIS scores postoperatively [14], but no hypotheses were formulated on the expected magnitude of change and no comparison with another instrument was made. Hence, reliability of the BIS overall was rated as sufficient (+). Nilai OR=53.229, dengan arti bahwa siswi dengan body image positif mempunyai peluang 53.23 kali untuk berpola makan baik. Body image is an important endpoint in quality of life evaluation since cancer treatment may result in major changes to patients' appearance from disfiguring surgery, late effects of radiotherapy or adverse effects of systemic treatment.
Far Cry 5 Eb Games, Quay 33 Booking, Odor Eliminator Bags, Dire Straits Live Album, Three Tenors Concert, Types Of Obesity,